DINÂMICAS AGROINDUSTRIAIS:
UMA ANÁLISE BIBLIOMÉTRICA DA TEORIA ATOR-REDE E SISTEMAS SOCIOTÉCNICOS
Palavras-chave:
Toeira Ator-Rede;, Sistema Sociotécnico;, Agroindústrias Rurais;, Análise Bibliométrica;Resumo
O presente artigo apresenta uma investigação bibliométrica detalhada sobre a aplicação da Teoria Ator-Rede (TAR) e do Sistema Sociotécnico no contexto das agroindústrias. Através de uma metodologia quantitativa e bibliométrica, o estudo explora publicações na Web of Science, revelando um crescente interesse acadêmico nessas teorias, refletindo a importância de abordagens sociotécnicas na análise das dinâmicas agroindustriais, a interdisciplinaridade e a relevância global da TAR e dos Sistemas Sociotécnicos em diversas áreas. A pesquisa evidencia um crescente interesse acadêmico nessas, refletindo a importância de perspectivas sociotécnicas na análise das dinâmicas agroindustriais. A TAR propõe uma visão integrada de humanos, máquinas, políticas e animais em redes dinâmicas, e o Sistema Sociotécnico fornece uma estrutura conceitual para compreender a estabilidade e transformação dos sistemas tecnológicos. Ambas as teorias são fundamentais para analisar como inovações tecnológicas envolvem a adaptação mútua de componentes heterogêneos. A pesquisa apresenta uma lacuna significativa na literatura específica sobre sua aplicação nas agroindústrias. A análise bibliométrica revelou a distribuição geográfica das publicações, demonstrando um interesse global nas teorias. A falta de estudos específicos aplicando essas teorias ao contexto das agroindústrias aponta para a necessidade de investigações futuras que explorem este território, visando elucidar as dinâmicas envolvidas no setor agroindustrial. As conclusões apontam para essa necessidade, visando contribuir para uma compreensão mais profunda dessas dinâmicas. O artigo encoraja a integração de perspectivas sociotécnicas no desenvolvimento rural sustentável e destaca a importância de abordagens interdisciplinares para avançar no entendimento e na prática das agroindústrias.
Referências
Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R. & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. AMJ, 47, 795–817, https://doi.org/10.5465/20159624.
Callon, M., Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In: K. Knorr-Cetina; A.V. Cicourel (eds.). Advances in social theory and methodology: toward and integration of micro- and macro-Sociologies. Boston: Routledge; Kegan Paul, pp.277-303.
Callon, M. (1984). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(1_suppl), 196-233. https://doi-org.ez89.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x
Creswell, J. W. (2003) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,
Fonseca, E. N. da, (1986). Bibliometria: teoria e prática; textos de Paul Otlet, Robert Estivais, Victor Zoltowski, Eugene Gartield. São Paulo, Cultrix.
Fox, S. (2000), Communities Of Practice, Foucault And Actor-Network Therory. Journal of Management Studies, 37: 853-868. https://doi-org.ez89.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1111/1467-6486.00207.
Geels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, Volume 33, Issues 6–7, Pages 897-920, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015.
Geels, F. W. (2010) Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective, Research Policy, Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 495-510, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022.
Geels, F. W. (2012) A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies, Journal of Transport Geography, Volume 24, Pages 471-482, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.021. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692312000269).
Geels, F. W. (2014). Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5), 21-40. https://doi-org.ez89.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1177/0263276414531627
Geels, F. W., Schot, J. (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways, Research Policy, Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 399-417, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733307000248).
Geels, F. W. (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study, Research Policy, Volume 31, Issues 8–9, Pages 1257-1274, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733302000628).
Greenhalgh, T. Stones, R. (2010) Theorising big IT programmes in healthcare: Strong structuration theory meets actor-network theory, Social Science & Medicine, Volume 70, Issue 9, Pages 1285-1294, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.034. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953610000778)
Latour, B. (2019). Gabriel Tarde and the End of the Social. Sociology of Power. 31. 217-239. 10.22394/2074-0492-2019-2-217-239.
Latour, B. (1986) The power of associations. In John Law (editor) Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge?, Sociological Review Monograph, Keele, pp. 261-277, 1986.
Latour, B. (2012) Reagregando o Social. Salvador. Edufba.
Latour B., Yaneva, A. (2017) Give Me a Gun and I Will Make All Buildings Move»: An ANT’s View of Architecture”, Ardeth [Online], 1 | 2017, Online since 01. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ardeth/991.
Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt, 47(4), 369–381. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40878163.
Law, J. (1992) Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice. 5, 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059830.
Lepak, D. P., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2007). Introduction to Special Topic Forum: Value Creation and Value Capture: A Multilevel Perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 180–194. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20159287.
Lindsley, D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B. (1995). Efficacy-Performance Spirals: A Multilevel Perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 645–678. https://doi.org/10.2307/258790.
Markard, J., Truffer, B. (2008) Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework, Research Policy, Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 596-615, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733308000164).
Marques, F. C. (2011) Nicho e novidade: nuanças de uma possível radicalização inovadora na agricultura. In: SCHNEIDER, S; GAZOLLA, M.(Orgs.). Os atores de desenvolvimento rural: práticas produtivas e processos sociais emergentes. Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS, p. 145-158.
Mol, A. (2010). Actor-Network Theory: Sensitive Terms and Enduring Tensions. Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie. 50.
Müller, M., Schurr, C. (2016), Assemblage thinking and actor-network theory: conjunctions, disjunctions, cross-fertilisations. Trans Inst Br Geogr, 41: 217-229. https://doi-org.ez89.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1111/tran.12117.
Murdoch, J. (1997). Inhuman/Nonhuman/Human: Actor-Network Theory and the Prospects for a Nondualistic and Symmetrical Perspective on Nature and Society. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15(6), 731-756. https://doi-org.ez89.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1068/d150731
Murdoch, J.(1998) The spaces of actor-network theory, Geoforum, Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 357-374, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(98)00011-6. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718598000116).
Sayes, E. (2014). Actor–Network Theory and methodology: Just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency? Social Studies of Science, 44(1), 134-149. https://doi-org.ez89.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1177/0306312713511867.
Smith, A., Voß, J. P., Grin, J. (2010) Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges, Research Policy, Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 435-448, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733310000375).
Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273. https://doi-org.ez89.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1177/0963662509102694.
WEB OF SCIENCE. https://www-webofscience.ez109.periodicos.capes.gov.br/wos/woscc/basic-search.
Weber, K. M., Rohracher, H. (2012) Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework, Research Policy, Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages 1037-1047, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733312000613).
Wiskerke, J. S. C., Bock, B. B., Stuiver, M., & Renting, H. (2003). Environmental co-operatives as a new mode of rural governance. NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 51(1–2), 9–25. https://doi-org.ez89.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1016/S1573-5214(03)80024-6
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Gilberto Laske, Clerio Plein- Os artigos, resenhas e demais trabalhos publicados na Revista Orbis Latina podem ser copiados, distribuídos, editados, remixados e utilizados desde que citada a fonte, sempre respeitando os limites da legislação sobre os direitos do(s) autor(es).
